Femtet Help/Manual
 

Home / Examples / Piezoelectric Analysis [Rayleigh] / Example 11: Transient Analysis

Example 11: Transient Analysis

General

  • Transient analysis is explained in this example.
     

  • As a result, the displacement change over the time can be viewed.
     

  • Unless specified in the list below, the default conditions will be applied.
     

  • Obtain this session's project file. (Right-click and choose 'Save link as')
    Model 1, "ImplicitMethod", is a transient analysis model. Simulation Time: 5 min 13 sec
    Model 2, "ResonantMethod", is a transient analysis model using the resonant analysis.
    Model 3, "ResonantMethod_auto", is a transient analysis model using the resonant analysis and its timestep is set automatically.
    The difference between Models 1, 2, and 3 lies only in the analysis conditions.

  • Results will vary depending on Femtet version and the PC environment.


  • Transient analysis is available in an optional package. However, transient analysis using resonant mode is not optional.

Analysis Space

Item

Settings

Analysis Space

3D

Model Unit

mm

 

Analysis Conditions

Item

Settings

Solver

Piezoelectric Analysis [Rayleigh]

Analysis Type

Transient Analysis

Transient Analysis Using Resonant Mode (Model 1)

Deselected

Transient Analysis Using Resonant Mode (Models 2 and 3)

 

Selected

 

 

The settings on the transient analysis tab are required.

For model 2, settings on the resonant analysis tab are required.

The resonant and transient analysis tabs are set up as follows.

Tab

Setting Item

Settings

Mesh

Order of Element 1st-order Element (Time Prioritized)

Resonant Analysis (only for Models 2 and 3)

Number of Modes

10

Approximated Frequency

0 [Hz]

Transient Analysis with Manual Setting (Models 1 and 2)

Timestep

Select [Manual]
0.05 [us]

Output Interval

5

Number of Calculation Steps

1000

Transient Analysis with Automatic Setting (Model 3)

Timestep

Select [Automatic]
Finish Time 50 [us]
Maximum Number of Calculation Steps 5000

*The results of model 2 show that the lowest resonant frequency is 455 kHz. The period (T0) is 2.2e-6 [sec]. When analyzing with timestep = T0/20 = 1.e-7, the difference in amplitude between Model 1 and Model 2 is observed. Consequently, the timestep = T/40 = 0.5e-7 is applied.

* For model 3, the timestep is automatically determined from the results of resonant frequencies.
One-tenth of a period of the highest resonant frequency is used as the timestep. (You can change the number of divisions per cycle)

Model (Common to Models 1, 2, and 3)

Body Attribute and Material Property Setting (Common to Models 1, 2, and 3)

Body Number/Type

Body Attribute Name

Material Name

0/Solid

piezo

000_P-4 *

* Available from the material DB

Boundary Condition (Common to Models 1, 2, and 3)

The time dependency of the applied voltage is defined by weight function.

Boundary Condition Name/Topology

Tab

Boundary Condition Type

Settings

earth/Face

Electric

Electric Wall

Specify electric potential: Electric Potential 0 [V]

Mechanical

Displacement

Select UZ only

UZ=0

hot/Face

Electric

Electric Wall

Specify electric potential: Electric Potential 1 [V]

Select [Time Dependency].

Define weight function.

Mechanical

Free

 

UX0/Face

 

Electric

Magnetic Wall

 

Mechanical

Displacement

Select UX only

UX=0

UY0/Face

Electric

Magnetic Wall

 

Mechanical

Displacement

Select UY

UY=0

 

The weight function set for the boundary condition of "hot" is plotted below.

Results (Comparison between Models 1 and 2)

The vibration is compared between models 1 and 2.

The diagram below is time response at the coordinates (2.5, 0.0, 0.1). The results of models 1 and 2 are plotted on the same graph.

 

 

  • See here for creating graph.
  • See [Field Graph] for more details.

  • To see the time response, click [Results] > [Select Solver] and select [Piezo/Time response].

 

        

  

The voltage is constant at 0 [V] after 30 [us] and the change in displacement response is observed.

 

Results (Comparison between Models 2 and 3)

Compare between models 2 and 3.

The results of Model 3, with automatic timestep setting, match well with those of Model 2.